I don’t see an advantage of what you’re suggesting, that’s all. a painting) an area would be better than three specific colors that look good together. If I understand it correctly - which I’m not sure since I can’t check, but they only show you the colors and maybe allow you to quickly jump to the next color in the color harmony right, is that correct? And it rotates with your chosen color? Does it also only allow super saturated color, or the less saturated and darker or lighter colors too? If so - I see it being useful for graphics design, when you need for example five specific colors, but for everything else (e.g. Also, even better, don’t tell me what the rings do, tell me what you want Krita to do, and why, and why you can’t achieve the same effect in Krita right now, or why it would be more comfortable with this new thing (and how much comfortable). So, what do those rings do, exactly? I can’t get Photoshop so I can’t check it. These rings are provided under different color selections schemes. Up above, once again, is not gamut mask, but a color wheel with multiple selection rings. Be constructive, please, and answer the questions the manual asks you (what’s the workflow, why it’s tedious to do now, why it would be better with this new cool feature). Not just post a screenshot and think that your job is done (outside of repeating that it would be cool to have it in Krita). And then, feature request is to explore solutions for that problem. If you say that that wheel with rings is more convenient, then it means the current way of doing things is less convenient, which is a problem (and then we can explore how much of a problem it is - if it’s a small problem and requires lots of development, for example, it might b not worth implementing if it’s a big problem and only a few lines of code, that’s something to implement right away). Oh there might have been some misunderstanding, then - every improvement is a good topic for feature request, and every new feature is a (supposed) improvement. If it was a feature request, I’d have to address a real problem, explain how to improve a certain workflow, basically go through the Krita’s documentation steps to follow for making a feature request. Selecting a given mode updates the icons of the buttons matching the default color schemes so that we have either the mask type or the regular type. Now to pick any of the scheme, one would simply have to press on one of the corresponding scheme buttons on the color wheel.ĭepending on the mode active, we can either select gamut mask buttons with default shapes, which are disposed on the gamut type of color wheel, or the simple schematic buttons, disposed on the regular type of color wheel. Let’s say there where two modes : Gamut masking mode and Color wheel modeĮach mode would give the option to select a particular scheme( monochromatic, complimentary, triadic, tetraedic, analogous, accented analogous(and more ?) ) Wait, advantage might be that since there are buttons ontop of the color wheel, anybody can choose a schematic way to pick colors already, and this before resorting to gamut masks. What if it was implemented not because it has an advantage but instead because it has no inconvenient ?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |